Windows 8 beta points to better touch-screen interfaces, but will they be any faster?
Friday, March 9th, 2012Spring is in the air and things are definitely stirring. It’s also a traditional time for new announcements by Apple, whose new iPad is due to be announced tomorrow (as I write this) and which always prompts thoughts as to how we might improve the usability of systems in general and hotel systems in particular. Not to disparage Apple’s aesthetic inspiration, but the directions Microsoft takes are usually more meaningful for mainstream users, and this week’s release of the Public Beta version of Windows 8 is therefore highly significant.
Its tile-based screen design, an enhancement of Microsoft’s Phone software approach, is both visually appealing and intuitively useful, with various tiles displaying brief information on their underlying context such as the number of unread e-mails. The applicability to hospitality management systems is obvious – different tiles could easily lead to lists of arriving guests, in-house groups, VIPs or other categories of information – but I’m just as interested in whether this will lead to a more touch-based interface in general.
Clearly many vendors have been moving towards this, as witness the number of tablet-based versions of systems now available. Few, however, have changed the fundamental design of their user interfaces towards a primarily touchscreen approach, with the notable and admirable exception of PAR Springer-Miller’s Atrio system. Most have ported their standard screen designs over to touch-screen devices and left it to the users to cope as best they can with fingers somewhat larger than ideal for the small target buttons. Microsoft’s new approach shows much more promise, although as with Atrio it remains to be seen how far the metaphor can be applied into more detailed functions such as setting up a multi-day, multi-room type group block with complex charge routing.
One thing I am curious about, though, is whether this touch-screen direction will actually produce faster processing of routine functions such as check-ins. When mouse-driven graphical user interfaces were first introduced they were always slower than traditional keyboard-based approaches, due to the need to focus and carefully position the cursor before clicking the mouse. With time, however, a generation of users brought up on Windows and gaming consoles closed the gap and began to see keyboards as the slower option. Will touch-screens be faster or slower? Drop me a line (jon
joninge
com) and let me know what you think.
